Is the relationship between providers and content mutually beneficial?
Consumers need the network and the content to be valuable? How can government add to that? Crawford: You’d think so. But providers have incentive to lean towards their content. They are too short sighted. Also, content providers are non-traditional Yoo: They are mutually beneficial and Supreme Court precedence shows that. The wireless industry exemplifies it. It prioritizes voice over data – because from a user perspective voice (phone call) needs immediate attention and data (email) can wait. How do networks deal with innovation? How will government have an impact? Frederickson: Net Neutrality will allow free flow of innovation. Discrimination is already happening. We need for it to remain free. Crawford: Call waiting was the late great innovation by providers – we need to enhance others. Yoo: We did have nondiscrimination rules but with each innovation they needed to get a waiver and that slowed down the process. Call waiting was slowed down because it wasn’t neutral. Comcast has iss
Related Questions
- What degree of relationship is required between a "specific purchase" and the power content of a particular electricity product as reflected in its power content label?
- Why doesn’t the County build a relationship with the lenders to achieve a mutually beneficial outcome?
- Any FW filter feeders that I could start a mutually beneficial relationship with?
