Is the postulated Darwinian mechanism, of mutation and natural selection, supported by evidence?
Very slight evidence. The creative power of the blind watchmaker (i.e., the mechanism of mutation and natural selection) is supported only by very slight evidence, such as the famous example of a moth population in which the percentage of dark moths increased during a period when the birds were better able to see light moths against the smoke-darkened background trees.
Related Questions
- Is the Darwinian postulated process of creation by mutation & natural selection foundationally atheistic in nature?
- Is the mechanism of mutation and natural selection believed by Darwinists to be purposeless and undirected?
- Is the postulated Darwinian mechanism, of mutation and natural selection, supported by evidence?
