Is the interface of the Service Domain valid for broadacst scenarios?
Since the object interfaces do not expose the transport mechanism, the same interfaces are valid for broadcast scenarios and interactive scenarios. (The client discovers the mechanism through the protocol state found inside the object references. The object reference, however, does not expose the state.) The architecture anticipates the design of applications which scale to both scenarios. Why does DSMCC-UU adopt the object oriented paradigm to perform simple stacks like directory browsing, file retrieval, and stream control? Why does the IETF instead provide simple protocols, for example the RTSP for stream control? The object design, to be specific the Interface Definition Language, automates the protocol design. It provides, after compilation, both the (implementation language specific) interface which encapsulates the protocol, plus the protocol itself. The application can program to the interface, in the application implementation language, rather than the protocol. The protocol i
Related Questions
- When using a default interface, are the WSDL and XSD files used by the SSE during the service execution or just for the workflow generation/compilation?
- How can I upgrade to RMs IronPort spam filtering service, if I have an RM email product but my DNS domain is not hosted by RM?
- Is my PolySpace software maintenance service subscription still valid? How can I renew it?
