Is the Hypertensive State an Integral Etiopathogenesis Centrally Involving Vascular Myofiber Ischemia?
Abstract: One might strictly recognize the essential hypertensive state as a form of evolving influence, itself both a cause and an effect of integral pathways of etiopathogenesis in vascular myofiber hypercontractility and vascular myofiber ischemia. Indeed, perhaps it is in terms of a circulatory hemodynamic disturbance that evolves both in terms primarily of myocardial hypertrophy and of vascular smooth myofiber hypercontractility that one would best understand the sustained series of both phasic and tonic responses to various systems of influence in inducing progression of the hypertensive state. Even in terms that would go beyond simple threshold considerations of such myofiber responsiveness or of myofiber contractility, the essential hypertensive state might primarily arise and evolve simply as one pathway of ischemic events that somehow progresses as positive feedback systems. Indeed, ischemia in hypertension would beget even more ischemia that evolves in terms of parameters th
Related Questions
- Is an individual who has been found guilty of a crime involving moral turpitude five years ago in another state eligible to pass the Level 2 screening?
- Does hypertension confer a hypercoagulable state in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats?
- How does HBO2 work to help reduce cerebral vascular accident ischemia?