Is the Great Global Warming Swindle now hopelessly compromised?
It is correct that both the AGW lobby and the sceptics highlight that data which supports their case, and neglect that which does not, but it is the obligation of the AGW lobby to prove their case as it is they who are demanding money and political power on the back of it. The AGW lobby put forward their case, and the sceptics point out errors and inconsistencies, and in the above mentioned cases, fraud and deception. This is a perfectly valid way to proceed. The truth is that there are too many unknown or poorly known factors to be certain how our climate works. Some responders here have used the words ‘toxic chemicals’ and ‘pollution’ in reference to global warming. CO2 is a natural and vital component of our atmosphere. Without it there would be no photosynthesis, therefore no plant life and no food. All the oxygen in our atmosphere comes as a by-product of photosynthesis, so without CO2 there would be no oxygen for us to breathe. Calling it a toxic chemical or pollution is scientif
