Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the Forest Service a Biased Adjudicator?

0
Posted

Is the Forest Service a Biased Adjudicator?

0

The powerful financial incentives engendered by the Salvage Sale Fund and the Knutson-Vandenberg Fund help to explain the Forest Service’s proclivity for post-fire logging. Forest Service managers, like all rational administrators, respond to incentives that promise to enhance fiscal flexibility and advance career prestige.[296] Indeed, the “incentives [driving the Forest Service] are so pervasive that most people simply take them for granted as immutable.”[297] Forest Service managers ignore these pressures at their peril, for to disregard such incentives would be to slight a very important source of funding. Because the agency has wide discretion over how to spend deposits from post-fire timber sales, the decision not to log would necessarily diminish the potential to cull off-budget income. Like private sector employees, employees in bureaucracies naturally desire “organizational stability” and job security.[298] As Randal O’Toole argues, Forest Service employees will take logical s

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123