Is the Bells cause of action barred by laches?
3. Does substantial evidence exist that Ygnatowiz violated the restrictive covenants? FACTUAL BACKGROUND All of the property involved in the underlying dispute originally belonged to the Bells. In 1971, however, the Bells as owners of E1/2, Section 21 T3N, R4W, M.P.M., Jefferson County, created a 12 tract subdivision. These ten acre tracts are numbered from west to east with 1 through 6 on the north boundary and 7 through 12 along the south boundary. There is property located between these two sets of tracts which belongs to the Bells. All of the tracts have been sold to third parties. The subdivision and the deeds to the property are subject to certain [*3] restrictive covenants. These restrictive covenants limit the use of the subdivision tracts to residential purposes. Commercial activity is restricted to only types that can be carried on within the confines of a private home or garage without making the residence secondary to the business. One of the restrictive covenants is a proh
