Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleibers equation a statistical artifact?

0
Posted

Is the 0.75 mass exponent of Kleibers equation a statistical artifact?

0

The statistical derivation of Kleiber’s 0.75 interspecific mass exponent ‘b’ is based on an assumption that the mass coefficient ‘a’ is constant irrespective of a mammal’s size and/or species. Analysis of covariance, a statistical technique not based on this assumption, reveals that the mass coefficient is not constant in a series of 7 species (Peromyscus m., mice, rats, cats, dogs, sheep, and cattle) but increases threefold with the size of the animal. THe mass coefficient is a power x mass-2/3, the power being expressed in watts and the mass in kg. (Peromyscus m.: a = 1.91 +/- 0.09; cattle: a = 6.06 +/- 0.14). The intragroup mass exponent is equal to 0.67 +/- 0.03 and is significantly different from 0.75. This study shows that the 0.75 interspecific mass exponent in Kleiber’s equation is a statistical artifact and suggests that the data from literature are consistent with the theory of biological similitude of Lambert and Teissier.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123