Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is SheerVideo faster than PhotoJazz?

faster PhotoJazz SheerVideo
0
Posted

Is SheerVideo faster than PhotoJazz?

0

Yes. On a single-CPU 1 GHz Mac G4, for example, SheerVideo encodes (110 MiB/s) and decodes (100 MiB/s) 50 times faster than BitJazz’s PhotoJazz (1.9 MiB/s). Note that SheerVideo is only 11% less powerful (2.20) than PhotoJazz (2.51) for real-world footage, and, unlike PhotoJazz, SheerVideo supports native video formats as well as RGB[A]. On the other hand, PhotoJazz supports many other formats as well, such as RGB[A*] 16b, CMYK[A*] 8b & 16b, multispectral, multitone, monochrome, and spot colors, and is also a much more powerful compressor for poster-quality imagery.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123