Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

IS SADDAM HUSSEIN LESS “DEMOCRATIC” THAN RED CHINA?

0
Posted

IS SADDAM HUSSEIN LESS “DEMOCRATIC” THAN RED CHINA?

0

“(b) the Congress reaffirms that it should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.” H. Res. 612 was enacted on a 417 to 5 roll call vote (#539, 12/17/98). Those voting in opposition were: John Conyers (D-Mich.), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.), Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.), Ron Paul (R-Tex.), and Mark Sanford (R-S.C.). THANK GOD THAT RON PAUL WAS THERE TO SPEAK AND VOTE AGAINST THE BIPARTISAN INTERVENTIONIST WAR ON JUSTICE, MORALITY, AND THE RULE OF LAW Congratulations to Ron Paul who had this to say about Clinton’s Iraq ploy: “[A]s a 5 yr Air Force veteran I rise in strong support of the troops: we all do. Everybody supports the troops. But this resolution is a lot more than supporting the troops….” WITHOUT RIGHT PURPOSE, VICTORY IS IMPOSSIBLE “[I]t is clearly stated in the Constitution that only Congress has the authority to declare

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123