Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is renal biopsy justified for the diagnosis and management of the nephrotic syndrome in the elderly?

0
0 Posted

Is renal biopsy justified for the diagnosis and management of the nephrotic syndrome in the elderly?

0
0

During the past decade, controversy has raged about the necessity of renal biopsy for the management of the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. The debate has centered on whether a precise diagnosis is imperative for steroid treatment or whether such therapy can be given blindly. The above question has not been addressed in the elderly. In this retrospective study 30 patients aged > 60 years, all of whom underwent a renal biopsy for an unexplained nephrotic syndrome, were categorized according to histological findings and clinical evolution of their disease. The spectrum of histology was diverse, the most common renal lesion diagnosed being membranous glomerulopathy (MGN) (23%). At variance with other works is the relatively high incidence of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) (20%) found by us. Minimal change disease (MCD) and amyloidosis were encountered in 5 (17%) and 4 patients (13%), respectively. Specific therapy (steroids) was administered in 11 patients. No benefit of s

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123