Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

IS REFORESTATION AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE?

0
10 Posted

IS REFORESTATION AN EFFECTIVE WAY TO FIGHT CLIMATE CHANGE?

0

Yes. It should be included as part of a broader climate change strategy. Estimates are that as much as 50% of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last 50 years may be due to the effects of land use change. Thus, restoring forestland represents a natural way to reverse these effects and combat climate change. As trees grow they absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it in living plant tissue. Reforestation of once-forested, but currently unproductive areas such as marginal agricultural lands is a recognized and proven way to sequester carbon. According to a recent study by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, climate change policies should include storage of carbon dioxide in U.S. forests.

0

Absolutely. But it takes time. While there is no silver bullet to this issue, reforesting once-forested but currently unproductive areas such as marginal agricultural lands is a recognized and proven way to sequester carbon dioxide. Estimates are that as much as 50% of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last 50 years may be due to the effects of land use change. Furthermore, the World Bank estimates that 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emission is caused by deforestation. Thus, restoring forestland represents a natural way to reverse these effects and combat climate change. According to the Pew Center on Global Climate Change climate change policies should include storage of carbon dioxide in U.S. forests.”Climate change is the major global environmental challenge of our time and in order to deal with it in the most cost-effective way, we need to consider the full range of solutions—and that includes carbon storage in forests,” said Eileen Claussen, President of th

0

Yes. It should be included as part of a broader climate change strategy. Estimates are that as much as 50% of the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last 50 years may be due to the effects of land use change. Thus, restoring forestland represents a natural way to reverse these effects and combat climate change. As trees grow they absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it in living plant tissue. Reforestation of once-forested, but currently unproductive areas such as marginal agricultural lands is a recognized and proven way to sequester carbon. According to a recent study by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, climate change policies should include storage of carbon dioxide in U.S. forests. “Climate change is the major global environmental challenge of our time and in order to deal with it in the most cost-effective way, we need to consider the full range of solutions — and that includes carbon storage in forests,” said Eileen Claussen, President of the

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.