Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

is over-reliance on ultrasound scans leading to negative explorations?

0
Posted

is over-reliance on ultrasound scans leading to negative explorations?

0

AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 – all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis–i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a “diagnostic” barium meal. The factors

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123