Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is non-conforming use the civil equivalent of ex post facto?

0
Posted

Is non-conforming use the civil equivalent of ex post facto?

0

Ahh!! But, *yes*, any attempt to penalize or criminalize the owners of those long-standing red houses would be ex post facto. Not allowed. Our constitution absolutely forbids it. In this hypothetical, the law forbids the NEW painting red of currently non-red houses. The ones that were already red, are “grand-fathered” and are legally allowed to remain as they are.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123