Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is mild hyperglycemia an underestimated evil?

0
Posted

Is mild hyperglycemia an underestimated evil?

0

So far little is known about the importance of different types of non-diabetic hyperglycemia for the development of macrovascular disease. The aim of this work was to examine the intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery (CCA), a well-accepted marker of atherosclerosis, as well as various risk factors for atherosclerosis in non-diabetic subjects with isolated fasting (IFH; n=67), isolated postchallenge (IPH; n=82) and combined hyperglycemia (CH; n=88) in comparison to normoglycemic (NG; n=265) controls. Subjects were participants of the RIAD study (Risk Factors in IGT for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes). IMT in the IPH (IMTmean: 0.89+/-0.02 mm; IMTmax: 1.01+/-0.02 mm; mean+/-SEM) and CH group (IMTmean: 0.91+/-0.02 mm; IMTmax: 1.03+/-0.02 mm) was significantly increased vs. the NG (IMTmean: 0.82+/-0.01 mm; IMTmax: 0.94+/-0.01 mm) and IFH group (IMTmean: 0.81+/-0.02 mm; IMTmax: 0.90+/-0.03 mm). IMT of the IFH group was similar to the normoglycemic controls. Subjects in the

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123