Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is MCP safe to use with 3.9, and do I still need mcpramlibpatch in my startup?

MCP safe startup
0
Posted

Is MCP safe to use with 3.9, and do I still need mcpramlibpatch in my startup?

0

Yes, but there are two things you should be aware of with MCP: • First, make sure that you don’t have any options in MCP that patch diskfont.library, as this will prevent 3.9’s font cache from working correctly. You still need mcpramlibpatch in your startup as the ramlib problem is caused by third-party libraries performing too complicated/stack-hungry tasks (opening other diskresident libs) within their init function. These libraries are therefore breaking certain programming rules; and it’s not a bug in ramlib itself. [Stephan Rupprecht] • Lastly, activating the “Processor” feature of MCP removes the ability of the RAD: device to be resident, so switching this off in MCP will restore it.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123