Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is low-density urban spread preferable to high-density construction?

0
Posted

Is low-density urban spread preferable to high-density construction?

0

Low-density Pro: Accommodates many different lifestyles Provides separation of industry form residential and commercial enterprises. Con: Requires more infrastructure – roads, services (water, power, schools, emergency, police, repairs and maintenance), communications etc. – increased local taxes Reduces available farmland. – makes food more expensive Involves higher transportation numbers – expense, pollution, public transit more expensive. High-Density Pro Reduces the public and private expense from reduced infrastructure – see above Public transport cheaper ==> less pollution, faster commute times, more time for leisure. Concentration provides savings for industry, arts and entertainment Cons Restrictions in lifestyle – size of homes. Health issues – communicable diseases. More land available for agriculture, recreation. Summary Low density planning is more expensive for infrastructure and services Low density planning provides for more individual choices of living accommodation. Hi

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123