Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is Ki-67 a better proliferative marker in the colon than proliferating cell nuclear antigen?

0
Posted

Is Ki-67 a better proliferative marker in the colon than proliferating cell nuclear antigen?

0

Endogenous markers of proliferating cells have increasingly supplanted the use of incubation of biopsy tissues in vitro with tritiated thymidine or with bromodeoxyuridine, thus avoiding the potential variation resulting from the incubation procedure. Antibodies to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) such as PC10 have been promoted as optimal for this purpose, although considerable variation in colonic proliferating cells with this antibody has been reported. We have compared the detection of colonic proliferating cells in normal mucosa and adenomata using the PC10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) to PCNA and the Mib-1 mAb to Ki-67 in formalin-fixed tissues using antigen retrieval solutions with microwaving. The PC10 antibody showed variable immunostaining of proliferating and nonproliferating cells with minor changes in primary antibody concentration or microwave conditions and between normal and adenomatous tissue. In contrast, Mib-1 immunostaining was quite constant with differing ant

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123