Is Justification By Grace Licentious In Tendency?
We have reserved to the close the discussion of the objec tion, that this doctrine of justification, by faith on Christs righteousness, tends to loosen the bonds of the moral law. There are two parties who suggest this ideathe legalists, who urge it as an unavoidable objection to our doctrine; and the Antinomians, who accept it as a just consequence of the doctrine. Both classes may be dealt with together, except as to one point growing out of the assertion that Christ fulfilled the preceptive, as well as bore the penal law in our stead. If this be so, says the Antinomian, how can God exact obedience of the believer, as an essential of the Christian state, without committing the unrighteousness of demanding payment of the same debt twice over? I reply, that it is not a pecuniary, but a moral debt. In explaining the doctrine of substitution, I showed that Gods acceptance of our Suretys work in our room was wholly an optional and gracious act with Him, because Christs vicarious work, how
Related Questions
- At this April meeting when the justification was made why a new book was needed, was there any discussion of the contents or substance of the biology book on the subject of evolution?
- What level of detail will be required as medical justification on the attachment to the claim for treatment of the child and the family therapy?
- Is Justification By Grace Licentious In Tendency?
