Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it true that the toxic organic (TO) methods are the only appropriate method for analyzing soil-gas samples?

0
10 Posted

Is it true that the toxic organic (TO) methods are the only appropriate method for analyzing soil-gas samples?

0
10

No, but you may be hearing this from some of the labs that specialize in these analyses. The argument is that EPA methods such as 8260 and 8021 are soil and water methods that use liquid standards and hence are not appropriate for air samples. Further, according to the argument, soil-gas samples are air samples and, thus, should be analyzed by air methods that use gaseous standards. The key difference in the methods is not the type of standard but how the standard and sample are introduced into the analytical instrument. TO-methods use air concentrators. Methods 8260 and 8021 use direct injection or purge-and-trap injection systems. For the majority of compounds of concern at vapor-intrusion sites (e.g., BTEX, chlorinated solvents), there is no significant difference caused by the injection methods. For some compounds (typically the more polar ones such as ketones and alcohols), methods 8021 and 8260 can give different values from the TO-methods by up to a factor of two to three if the

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123