Is it true that the prosecutors still believed Boney even after his DNA was matched to the \BACKBONE”” sweatshirt and he also failed a polygraph examination about him killing the Camm family?
Either they believed this prolific liar or their agenda was to get him to give them the story they needed. On the afternoon of February 28, 2005 or after the public became aware that Boney was the owner of the ”BACKBONE” sweatshirt, the prosecutors held a news conference and they claimed that Boney’s story checked out. Apparently what was meant when they supported this 11 time convicted felon was that his story about dropping his sweatshirt at the Salvation Army drop box could have been truthful but there was no way to verify that claim. The Salvation Army had no records, no receipts, no video, no witnesses and no other means to verify Boney’s claim. Simply because it couldn’t be discounted doesn’t mean that it checks out, however. At that same news conference, nothing was said that Boney had already failed a polygraph test when it was given to him ten days before. They knew for ten days that he had failed a polygraph test and that his DNA was at the murder scene. Ten days and still B
Related Questions
- Is it true that the prosecutors still believed Boney even after his DNA was matched to the \BACKBONE"" sweatshirt and he also failed a polygraph examination about him killing the Camm family?
- Was CODIS ever queried in an attempt to identify the unknown male DNA found on the "BACKBONE" sweatshirt?
- Boney took and failed a polygraph?
