Is it true that stun guns depend on pain compliance alone?”>Is it true that stun guns depend on pain compliance alone?
Some critics argue that stun guns depends on pain compliance exclusively, but we think that that argument oversimplifies what a stun gun can do. It is definitively NOT the same hitting somebody with a baseball bat than applying an electrical current: both self-defenses affects the human nervous system differently. Even if stun guns depended on pain compliance alone, it would still help you dominate most attackers anyways (but it would be less effective in a small percentage of criminals who may have a very high tolerance to pain, such as some drug addicts). If the pain compliance alone theory were true, owning a stun gun would still be a necessary protection measure, specially because not all aggressors are on drugs (for example: a rapist). Additionally, it is important to remember that not all drug addicts have such high tolerance to pain (not all drug addicts are equal, especially because different addicts use different drugs that not always include high tolerance to pain as one of i
