Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it safe to assume Bradley conforms to the markets moves?

0
Posted

Is it safe to assume Bradley conforms to the markets moves?

0

Observation: It is probably not wise to look at little rallies in the Middle-term Indicator or Bradley Indicator and compare tops and bottoms of the indicators’ values to previous rallies and bottoms in the markets. No. It would NOT be a safe assumption that the March, 2003, stock market low will hold when the Bradley Indicator turns up in late November … although it may. Keep in mind, the Bradley indicator is a directional indicator (not amplitude). That is because it is the planetary positional relationships from Earth’s perspective that drive the computations, and regardless of the positions each relationship (aspect) derives its maximum value, either positive or negative, as the sine curve of the aspect approaches dead-on (perfect alignment), i.e., squares, trines, opposition, conjunctions, sextiles. Therefore, with a finite number of planetary objects and relationships, there naturally is a limit to how high or low the Bradley Indicator’s values may be. Therefore, the maximum va

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123