Is it right for scientists to assume that extrasensory perceptions are invalid because they have no proof?
Yes, the discipline of science calls for proof of everything before accepting anything as fact or truth…… on the one hand this discipline does prevent or delay science to access certain truths for which the proof is not yet available, but at the same time, it also ensures that whatever science accepts is more and better defined and its any subsequent rejection can not happen without further proof to that effect. Therefore science helps us narrow down and refine truths for us. Extrasensory perceptions can either be facts or imaginary illusions…. all science says is that it is unable to confirm either way. However, let us not forget that there are umpteen scientists who do believe personally in some such perceptions based on their own individual experiences. What it means is that these scientists are not absolutely bound by the limitations of science and are willing to look and explore beyond provided there is strong personal experience to warrant such transgression. I believe that
