Is it reasonable to assume that Rochester would be the preferred corridor versus other passenger rail corridors, such as a route along the Mississippi River?
There are advantages and disadvantages to any proposed route. However, given that siting a high-speed passenger rail line will be a multi-generational decision, we believe the routing decision needs to be made based on which route serves the most people, offers the greatest public benefit and has the best chance of financial viability. A route through Rochester is the most logical because Rochester is the regional economic hub of southeast Minnesota. It is expected to continue its strong growth (economically and population) for years to come and already has a strong base of travelers with Rochester as their destination. This route would not only have direct benefits to Rochester but would also serve major employers and the general public throughout southeast Minnesota.
Related Questions
- Is it reasonable to assume that Rochester would be the preferred corridor versus other passenger rail corridors, such as a route along the Mississippi River?
- What route would a high-speed passenger rail line take through Rochester? How much will it cost?
- What route would high-speed passenger rail travel?
