Is it possible to propose an alternative to LFG monitoring for a portion of the LF?
In those cases when an operator believes monitoring along the entire perimeter of the waste disposal footprint (i.e., facility boundary) is not necessary, the operator shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of EA and CIWMB that LFG migration could not occur due to geologic barriers and that no inhabitable structure or other property or land use, such as agricultural lands, within 1,000 feet of the disposal site permitted facility boundary is threatened by LFG migration [27 CCR 20925(a)(1)]. The demonstration shall be specific to the portion of the perimeter where the operator proposes to not monitor.
