Is it necessary to work with hypotheses when using an analytical view? Is it not possible to use analytical view to create something new using theory and empirics?
It is possible, of course, to use analytical view to create something new, but it is not contradicting working with hypotheses. Abduction, which is a directly renewing way of working within the analytical view, is known to use just hypotheses as one important instrument for verification/falsification (see question 3 above). 20. I think that the borderlines between the three different views might be a bit unclear. How is it possible to decide where the borders are? Is it important to know which view one works with in all situations? Is it possible to use more than one specific view successfully in the same study? The borderlines between the ultimate presumptions as far as the different views are concerned are relatively clear. And the clearer one is of this as a creator of knowledge, the less unclear the distinctions become in a practical application, even if it might be different to exactly pointing out where the borderlines are. Whether it is important to know which view one works wit
Related Questions
- Is it necessary to work with hypotheses when using an analytical view? Is it not possible to use analytical view to create something new using theory and empirics?
- Is it possible to create a new filter without having to copy a pre-defined one from the custom View?
- Is it possible to create a magnetic difference engine using stirling theory?
