Is it likely that nuclear scientists in the 40s would be handling uranium and plutonium?
This would be highly unlikely. Very few people felt so threatened by the Japanese to be willing to risk their lives on a theoretical chance of a superbomb that could end a far-away war a little sooner. • 6. Aren’t there witnesses to the atomic bomb in Hiroshima? The only “witnesses” that could possibly survived this supposed explosion would have been blinded by the intense flash of light, so their testimony is quite unreliable and contradictory. • 7. According to conventional historians, was the uranium bomb tested before supposedly being dropped over Hiroshima? No. There was no testing whatsoever of a uranium bomb in Alamogordo or anywhere else before Hiroshima. • 8. Isn’t that strange? Yes. Typical weapons are tested for months and years before deployment; there is no other weapon that according to the accepted “facts” deployed before any testing whatsoever. • 9. How many witnesses are there for all of the atomic tests allegedly occuring during the fifties and sixties? Very few, perh
