Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it legally “safe” to release software under The Free World Licence?

0
10 Posted

Is it legally “safe” to release software under The Free World Licence?

0
10

I cannot provide a formal statement on the legal safety of this licence. However, the Free World Licence contains No-Warranty (Clause 6.1) and No-Liability (Clause 6.2) clauses that are as strong as those of the GNU GPL. Furthermore, these clauses are more strongly enforced because the Free World Licence forms a contract between the software’s originator and user that invokes the no-warranty and no-liability clauses with contractual strength. In contrast, the GNU GPL does not create a contract between the originator and the non-distributing end-user, which means that its no-warranty and no-liability clauses have the status of warnings rather than of contractually binding clauses. All this suggests that the Free World Licence provides a higher level of legal safety than the GNU GPL. This said, The Free World Licence is a new licence and it may contain significant unforseen legal problems, whereas the GNU GPL is a well “burnt-in” licence.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123