Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it better to use a larger FFT or to decimate when trying to resolve the frequency between two closely spaced tones?

0
Posted

Is it better to use a larger FFT or to decimate when trying to resolve the frequency between two closely spaced tones?

0

Increasing the frequency bin resolution by using a larger FFT size, by decimating with the down mixer, and by using a lower sample rate are all equivalent operations. They can even be combined for even more signal extraction gain. The differences between methods are: • A larger FFT size is not as efficient and requires more CPU power but it has the most flexibility. • Decimating with the down mixer reduces the sample rate but it adds filter skirts (roll-off) to the left and right of the spectrum. • A lower sample rate reduces the sample rate by doing the resampling with the audio cards ADC. This doesn’t utilize a CPU performance hit but it can create a serious artifact problem with some sound cards. The current bin resolution can be found in the Drift Integrators pop down section.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123