Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it adequate to have a transfer agreement that speaks to the transfer of the “trauma patient” but does not define specific conditions (e.g. burn, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury)?

April 26, 2017adequate Agreement burn Conditions define speaks transfer

0

Posted

Is it adequate to have a transfer agreement that speaks to the transfer of the “trauma patient” but does not define specific conditions (e.g. burn, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury)?

2 Answers

0

Posted

Yes. A general transfer agreement that addresses the transfer of trauma patients, but does not specifically define anatomical and physiological conditions, is adequate as long as the receiving facility is capable of definitively caring for all trauma patients.

0

10 Posted

Yes. A comprehensive transfer agreement that addresses the transfer of trauma patients but does not specifically define anatomical and physiological conditions is adequate as long as the receiving facility is capable of definitively caring for all trauma patients.