Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is it accurate to say that science disproves things?

accurate disproves
0
Posted

Is it accurate to say that science disproves things?

0

A. But science does disprove things. And, in fact, an essential element of the scientific process is — this is why the testable hypothesis is so important. A theory is not a useful theory unless we can generate it from — generate from it testable hypotheses. And science will occasionally disprove those hypotheses. And I mentioned earlier, I think I mentioned rather briefly, that the most popular hypothesis as to how amino acids are joined together inside the ribosome which has been that ribosomal RNA acts as a ribozyme, an acid based catalyst, to put those together. Now looks as though it’s been disproven by experiments that I mentioned before that were done by Al Dahlberg at my university. That’s a classic case of a really, really useful testable scientific hypothesis whose disproof leads us, hopefully, in a more productive direction. So in a few years, we’ll find out what the real chemical mechanism is of bond formation.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123