Is inducibility of atrial fibrillation after radio frequency ablation really a relevant prognostic factor?
AIMS: The study was intended to assess the prognostic value of inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) after radio frequency ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty four patients with drug-resistant paroxysmal (n=165) or persistent AF (n=69) underwent either Lasso-guided segmental pulmonary vein isolation (n=83) or CARTO-guided left atrial circumferential ablation (n=151). After ablation, two attempts to induce AF (>1 min) by decremental coronary sinus stimulation were performed. Patients were followed for at least 6 months (median: 12.7 months). At 6 months of follow-up, 67% of patients with paroxysmal and 48% of patients with persistent AF were AF-free. Inducibility of AF was a significant predictor of AF recurrence in univariate [hazard ratio (HR)=2.32, P<0.001] and multivariable (HR=2.19, P<0.001) Cox regression analyses. The prognostic value of inducibility was present in both patients with paroxysmal (HR=2.38, P=0.001) and persistent AF (HR=1.91, P=0.034) and did n
Related Questions
- How does the MicroMaze procedure differ from other atrial fibrillation treatments available today, such as radiofrequency ablation?
- Might Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Provide a Better Outcome Than Antiarrhythmic Therapy?
- How does pharmacologic therapy compare with catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation?
