Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is increased fat content of hindmilk due to the size or the number of milk fat globules?

0
Posted

Is increased fat content of hindmilk due to the size or the number of milk fat globules?

0

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: It is known that the fat content of breast milk is higher in hindmilk than in foremilk. However, it has not been determined if this increased fat content results from an increase in the number of milk fat globules (MFGs), an increase in the size of MFGs, or both. This study aims to determine which factor plays the most important role. METHODS: Thirteen breastfeeding mothers were enrolled in the study and we obtained 52 samples from 26 breasts before (foremilk) and after (hindmilk) a breastfeeding session. The fat content was evaluated by creamatocrit (CrCt) values. MFG size was measured with the laser light scattering method. We compared CrCt values and MFG size between foremilk and hindmilk. RESULTS: Although the CrCt values were higher in the hindmilk (8.6 +/- 3.6%) than in the foremilk (3.7 +/- 1.7%), the MFG size did not change (4.2 +/- 1.0 mum and 4.6 +/- 2.1 mum, foremilk and hindmilk, respectively). There was no relationship between the changes in CrCt vers

0

GROUND: It is known that the fat content of breast milk is higher in hindmilk than in foremilk. However, it has not been determined if this increased fat content results from an increase in the number of milk fat globules (MFGs), an increase in the size of MFGs, or both. This study aims to determine which factor plays the most important role. METHODS: Thirteen breastfeeding mothers were enrolled in the study and we obtained 52 samples from 26 breasts before (foremilk) and after (hindmilk) a breastfeeding session. The fat content was evaluated by creamatocrit (CrCt) values. MFG size was measured with the laser light scattering method. We compared CrCt values and MFG size between foremilk and hindmilk. RESULTS: Although the CrCt values were higher in the hindmilk (8.6 +/- 3.6%) than in the foremilk (3.7 +/- 1.7%), the MFG size did not change (4.2 +/- 1.0 mum and 4.6 +/- 2.1 mum, foremilk and hindmilk, respectively). There was no relationship between the changes in CrCt versus MFG size fr

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123