Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is GSM more dangerous than CDMA technology?

CDMA dangerous GSM Technology
0
Posted

Is GSM more dangerous than CDMA technology?

0

GSM and DECT technology use a series of low-frequency periodic (regular) bursts of microwave radiation. There is significant evidence that this causes more adverse health problems than continuous microwave radiation (like VHF FM radio transmissions, for example) at the low (non-thermal) exposure levels that we have in our modern environment. See the reports on increase in cancer incidence listed on the Powerwatch masts page. CDMA should have been less problematic as the modulation is less “aggressive” and the power is spread over a wider bandwidth of microwave frequencies and therefore has a lower signal strength for the same amount of transmitted power. However we are finding far more problems being reported by people in the UK with the two CDMA based systems used here – 3G (UMTS) and TETRA. These do not fully comply with true CDMA in that they both also impose regular low frequency timing pulses into the signal. Also the phase modulation used produces a lot of electrical/electronic n

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123