Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is Getting Rid of “Floors” on Credit Card Interest Rates Actually Bad for Consumers?

0
Posted

Is Getting Rid of “Floors” on Credit Card Interest Rates Actually Bad for Consumers?

0

Oddly, Felix Salmon and I find ourselves on different sides of a debate over credit card rates–and he is taking the side of the banks. Felix is worried about an impending rule against putting “floors” on credit card interest rates: Sounds great, right? Surely if there’s no minimum interest rate, that’s got to be good for consumers? Actually, no: there’s a problem here, due to the fact that interest rates are very low right now. Let’s say that I’m a customer-owned credit union, and I want to issue my customers a card carrying a low interest rate of 9.9%. I also want to protect myself in case rates rise a lot, so I put in language saying that the interest rate always has to be at least 3.9 percentage points over the Prime rate. Prime is currently just 3.25%, but if Ben Bernanke were to raise the Fed funds rate past 3%, then the rate on the credit card would begin to rise. As of February 22, that kind of product will be illegal. The variable-interest bit (Prime + 3.9%) is fine. But if yo

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123