Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is Flucidity Theory really a Theory of Everything?

0
Posted

Is Flucidity Theory really a Theory of Everything?

0

By popular definition a “Theory of Everything” is a theory that unifies gravity, elementary particles, the laws of motion, and the laws that govern forces. Flucidity Theory not only does that without the need for complex mathematics but extends the definition of a true Theory of Everything to actually include everything. A theory that only unifies the fundamental forces in physics is not a Theory of Everything but a “Theory of Everything in Physics”. Granted, unifying everything into one simple model may seem impossible to do but why not try? To date, there is no record of any scientist making such an attempt. It simpy wouldn’t be scientific to unify economics, politics, biology, psychology, and everything else into one model. Yet, we must remember that we invent complexity, not nature. Nature takes a few fundamental ideas and propagates the entire universe. We then create complex sciences and explanations for a simplicity that we do not yet grasp, as though we need to be supergeniuses

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123