Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is early anticoagulation necessary after biological aortic valve replacement?

0
Posted

Is early anticoagulation necessary after biological aortic valve replacement?

0

Early antithrombotic therapy after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) is controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of thromboembolic events (TE) without anticoagulation treatment during the first 3 months after surgery. Out of 143 consecutive patients who underwent biological AVR from January 1998 to December 2004, 127 patients who did not receive anticoagulation were included (89%). Events during the first 3 months after surgery included: 2 strokes (1.5%), 2 major bleedings (1.5%) and 9 deaths (7%) (none of them due to TE). In conclusion, the management of patients without antithrombotic treatment after biological AVR seems to be safe due to a low rate of TE.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123