Is DNA evidence admissible in a trial?
Generally yes. DNA refers to deoxyribonucleic acid, the foundation or blueprint for all living creatures. Provided its testing is conducted at a reputable facility and in a generally accepted manner, DNA evidence is considered a reliable scientific technique. Many, in fact, consider DNA evidence to be an invaluable tool in the pursuit of justice because it provides each human’s unique genetic code and is identical in blood, saliva, semen, and skin. Its durability also draws acclaim: in some case, traces of DNA can be recoverable for decades, even centuries. The use of DNA evidence in trials does present concerns, however. The most notable concerns are mishandling and tampering. Indeed, allegations of “bad collecting” by law enforcement officials can help to exonerate a defendant whose DNA would otherwise incriminate him. This was most famously seen in the murder trial of O.J. Simpson. 3) How could Clemens challenge McNamee’s physical evidence? Clemens’ attorneys could offer at least tw
