Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is DMIS Part 2 a standard or an application programming interface (API) definition?

0
10 Posted

Is DMIS Part 2 a standard or an application programming interface (API) definition?

0
10

Both: DMIS Part 2 is a standard interface definition. In a nutshell, DMIS Part 2 establishes a standard interface API by which various applications can interact with a CMM or other DME using an object-oriented programming approach. The API is derived directly from DMIS – Part 1 commands have been mapped either to DMIS Part 2 objects (eg. feature and carriage definitions), or to methods on those objects (eg. machine motion). The key here is that DMIS Part 2 defines a standard INTERFACE; it does not attempt to prescribe an IMPLEMENTATION architecture. For instance, FeatAct::get_comp_points() requires the DME to return the compensated data points for a feature, unless point buffering (PTBUFF) was off. How the implementation performs this is not of interest to DMIS Part 2 – the DME may store all of the compensated data points in memory, it may cause a recalculation of the data points from the raw points at the time of the request, or it could retrieve these points from a disk file. All tha

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123