Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is Direct Control A Good Policy To Correct Externalities?

0
Posted

Is Direct Control A Good Policy To Correct Externalities?

0

For almost all pollution, as well as other health and safety externalities, governments rely on direct regulatory controls; these are often called social regulations. For example, the 1970 Clean Air Act reduced allowable emissions of three major pollutants by 90 percent. In 1977, utilities were told to reduce sulphur emissions at new plants by 90 percent. In a series of regulations over the last decades, firms were told they must phase out ozone depleting chemicals. And so it goes with regulation. While it is possible that the regulatory might choose pollution control edicts in a way that guarantees economic efficiency, in practice that is not very likely. Indeed, much pollution control suffers from extensive government failures. For example, pollution regulations are often set without comparisons of marginal costs and marginal benefits, and without such comparisons there is no way to determine the most efficient level of pollution control. Indeed, for some regulatory programs the law

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123