Is Collective Security Fundamentally Different to Realism?
… purports to deny. This essay concludes that in the transfer of collective security ideals into practice, realism becomes its dominant theory. Realism is the school of thought that sees the international system as one of anarchy, with no authority to provide order amongst sovereign states. In this system, sovereign states must therefore pursue their own interest and attempt to maximise their position in the system.1 This theory is often termed realpolitik or ‘power politics’2 as it is assumed states will always seek to enhance their own power to ensure their survival amongst numerous competing states. Realist and Neo-realist theorists such as Morgenthau and Mearsheimer, therefore envisage that stability in the international system is best preserved through a ‘balance of power’, in which states are deterred from violent conflict through fear that they may lose any such battle. The principles of realism can be seen to be; the anarchy of the …
Related Questions
- Are there different certification requirements for managers than for technically oriented information assurance or information security personnel?
- Does EZ-DBR offer different levels of security so employees who enter data cannot see all of my totals and statistics?
- What makes eTrust EZ Armor different from other security software solutions?
