Is closing state parks a retaliatory move for defeat of propositions?
Dear Editor, Regarding the state budget dilemma: Closing the State Parks would have a negative effect upon the budget deficit while having a most profound effect upon the citizens. Much of the work in the state parks is done by volunteers and docents (no cost to the state). People who visit state parks spend money in and around the parks, in addition to the admission fees to the parks themselves. The state would lose the tax revenue from all of the business lost due to park closures, not to mention the loss of admission fees. Closing the state parks almost seems like retaliatory action to “pay the voters back” for defeating the propositions. I recommend that the state cut off all services to illegal immigrants, we would probably be able to quickly solve the deficit. That means that if someone cannot prove that they are here legally, they could not enroll children in schools (smaller class sizes!), no subsidized housing, no scholarships, no free medical care except life or death emergen
