Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is CAMPFIRE replacing National Parks?

0
Posted

Is CAMPFIRE replacing National Parks?

0

Zimbabwe has set aside, in perpetuity, more than 12% of its land as protected wildlife areas. Most of these are surrounded by communal lands. CAMPFIRE will help prevent the protected areas from becoming islands in a sea of development by making wildlife valuable for nearby communities. CAMPFIRE, however, was never intended as a way to create buffer zones around national parks, but as a rural development program with a strong element of community empowerment. One spin-off is that CAMPFIRE has enabled communities to enter into a debate on the management of protected areas, enhancing the likelihood of joint planning between these communities and national parks. Such ‘co-management’ may indeed hold the best hope for the future of national parks across Africa.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123