Is Bradley based on science or astrology?
My understanding: While I don’t profess to have the answers, here is my opinion. Astrology has its basis in the relationships of the planets on the moment of one’s birth. So right up front, I throw out astrology as having anything to do with Bradley. Bradley’s research was the summation of a great number of mathematical comparisons and computations based on the planets’ positions from day to day. Bradley concluded that certain of the planetary positions have a positive valence while others have a negative valence; how he determined that I don’t remember reading in his work but I assume it was based on observation as part of his research. So I look at the Bradley concept and I don’t know why it seems to work but I know the computations related to the changing planetary positions yield a series of values that can be plotted on a graph; it’s called a siderograph. And when those points are plotted, observation seems to reveal that forthcoming important trend changes in markets are strongly
