Is enchmark beating by Australian firms evidence of earnings management?
Author InfoJeff Coulton Sarah Taylor Stephen Taylor Abstract We investigate the extent to which Australian firms that report small profits and/or small increases in earnings (i.e. benchmark beaters) have done so by the upward manipulation of these earnings. Although evidence of an unusually large number of firms managing to just beat such earnings benchmarks has been interpreted as evidence of earnings management, this approach fails to identify those firms that are the manipulators from those where unbiased earnings fall naturally into the benchmark beating group. Our results suggest that caution is required in interpreting benchmark beating as an indicator of the extent of earnings management. Using several methods for estimating the unexpected accrual component of earnings, we show that although benchmark beaters have larger positive unexpected accruals than other firms, a similar result holds when firms with small losses or earnings declines (i.e. ‘just miss’ firms) are compared wi
Related Questions
- Quantitative methods have traditionally been associated with benchmark replication in passive management. As firms apply quantitative methods to active management on a large scale, what, if anything, is changing in the modeling approach?
- How does InterimManagement.com compare to Executive Search firms and to Management Consultants?
- Why do firms look to outsource their application and database management?
