Is atrial fibrillation resulting from rheumatic mitral valve disease a proper indication for the maze procedure?
GROUND: There are a few patients without detectable atrial contraction despite restoration of atrial rhythm after the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with mitral valve disease. METHODS: From January 1995 to March 1997, 29 consecutive patients with AF associated with mitral valve disease underwent our modified maze procedure combined with mitral or other valve operations. The causes of mitral valve disease were rheumatic mitral stenosis (n = 22) and nonrheumatic mitral regurgitation (n = 7). The 17 patients with postoperative atrial rhythm were divided into group I with rheumatic mitral stenosis (n = 10), and group II with mitral regurgitation of nonrheumatic origins (n = 7). RESULTS: Seventeen patients regained atrial rhythm, 2 patients had junctional rhythm, and another 10 remained in AF. Between the group of patients with restoration of atrial rhythm and that of patients remaining in AF, significant differences were found in the percentage with rheumatic diseas
