Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is a post period translation of an original text a primary source?

0
Posted

Is a post period translation of an original text a primary source?

0

No, the translation is only a primary source for the translation and that is post 1600. Only the original document itself is a primary source. Of course it is doubtful that you will get to use the original document. Therefore, cite that you used a photocopy of the original document if that is the case and the source of that copy. Also if you are using a translation, you might want to identify who did the translation and when.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123