Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is a Goal of 100% Biventricular Pacing Necessary?

0
Posted

Is a Goal of 100% Biventricular Pacing Necessary?

0

Objectives: The goal of this analysis was to determine the appropriate biventricular pacing target in patients with heart failure (HF). Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) decreases the risk of death and HF hospitalization. However, the appropriate amount of biventricular pacing is ill-defined. Methods: Mortality and HF hospitalization data from patients undergoing CRT in 2 trials (CRT RENEWAL [Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Registry Evaluating Patient Response with RENEWAL Family Devices] and REFLEx [ENDOTAK RELIANCE G Evaluation of Handling and Electrical Performance Study]; n = 1,812) were analyzed in a post-hoc fashion. Subjects were grouped based on percent biventricular pacing quartiles with the use of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Subjects were age 72 ± 11 years; 72% were men and 67% had coronary artery disease. Subjects paced 93% to 100% (quartiles 2 to 4) had a 44% reduction in hazard of an event compared with subjects paced 0% to 92% (quartile 1;

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123