Is 2010 a legitimate sequel to 2001: A Space Odyssey?
“.According to Arthur C, Clarke, “The book and film were written simultaneously, with feedback in both directions” (from The Lost Worlds of 2001, by Clarke).” ” .There is no reason to believe that Clarke and Kubrick were in complete agreement on what all of the details and nuances of the story and the ideas were.” http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.ph…postcount=8408 Alright, this is of course in your opinion, as I understand 2010 is a “official” sequel to 2001. In my opinion it’s like saying S. Darko IS a sequel to Donnie Darko. Yes 2001 the movie is based on Clarke’s work and it was more of a collaborative effort. But then again so much of Stanley vision and ideas were used for the movie that it ultimately was Stanley’s movie. As I understand it Stanley pretty much had the last say about the movie and what direction it should take. I do not see 2010 as a real sequel to 2001, as Stanley did not want a sequel made for HIS movie. “Stanley Kubrick had all models and sets from 2001: A Spa
